One of the biggest challenges in product development is finding the balance between building a feature-rich product and launching quickly to gather user feedback. At Fractal Labs, we’ve seen first-hand how critical it is to focus on a Minimum Viable Product (MVP)—a version of the product that includes only the core features needed to validate key assumptions. A well-constructed MVP allows you to test your hypothesis early, gather feedback, and refine your product before investing significant resources into further development.
In this article, we will explore how to build MVPs with precision, prioritize features and validate hypotheses efficiently, all while keeping costs under control.
Every new product or innovation is essentially an experiment. At the heart of every MVP is the concept of testing assumptions. When a founder start to build their product, they often have a grand vision with many features and functionalities in mind. However, building all of these features upfront is not only costly, but can also lead to a product that misses the mark with users.
Matt Lim, Product Manager at Fractal Labs, emphasize the importance of stripping back non-essential features and focusing on the core value proposition. "We encourage founders to be ruthless about what they’re building for the MVP," Matt explains. "It’s about validating your hypothesis and getting feedback as soon as possible."
By focusing on an MVP, companies can release a product faster, get real user insights, and adjust development priorities accordingly.
The main challenge in building an MVP is deciding which features to include. It requires a clear understanding of the core hypothesis you’re testing. The goal is to focus on the minimum functionality needed to prove your idea.
Austin Wood, CEO and Tech Lead at Fractal Labs, explains, "We've seen clients who want to add everything to the MVP. But the reality is, more features don't always lead to better outcomes. Often, it's about identifying what’s critical to test your assumptions and keeping the build simple."
For example, when developing Your Personal Quant, a stock prediction app, we focused on two key elements: stock data predictions and real-time sentiment analysis. Instead of adding complex features like account management or complex user permissions, we concentrated on testing the app’s core value—whether combining stock data with real-time news could help traders make better decisions.
To prioritize features effectively:
The goal of an MVP is to quickly validate your hypothesis with real user feedback. By launching early, even with a limited feature set, you can test if your app solves the problem you set out to address.
Matt Lim notes that one of the biggest risks is spending too much time and money on features users don’t care about. "You don’t want to spend months building something, only to find out it’s not what users needed."
Releasing an MVP lets you iterate quickly. If your hypothesis is correct, you can build on your success. If not, you can pivot without wasting resources on unnecessary features.
Even better—find a way to test your hypothesis without writing code at all. This can be through a waitlist or simply by having engaging conversations with your potential customers or users.
This approach worked well for Practice Interviews, an app designed to help users improve their interview skills. Rather than building out every possible feature, we focused on validating whether users found the AI-generated feedback helpful. Once this was proven, we added features like modular feedback and the ideal answer based on user input.
Feature bloat is a common problem in MVP development. Founders often feel the need to add every feature imaginable to satisfy all potential users. This can lead to a bloated product that delays launch and drains resources.
"The MVP isn’t about building the perfect product. It’s about getting something into users' hands quickly and refining it based on their feedback," says Austin Wood.
Avoiding feature bloat keeps the focus on what matters—validating your core hypothesis. Once you’ve proven your assumptions, you can expand the feature set based on real user data.
Once your MVP is live, gathering and analyzing feedback is critical for determining your next steps. This feedback will guide which features to add, what needs improvement, and what should be cut.
At Fractal Labs, we believe in continuous iteration. We release small updates based on feedback to refine the product over time. For example, in Your Personal Quant, user feedback led to the addition of features like confidence levels in stock predictions. In Practice Interviews, feedback guided us to develop features that helped users focus on specific areas for improvement like the development of more modular, bite-sized feedback.
This approach ensures that each feature added to the product is informed by real user needs.
Building an MVP is about delivering just enough to test your hypothesis and gather meaningful feedback. At Fractal Labs, we focus on helping founders prioritize essential features, test assumptions early and iterate based on user feedback. This approach not only saves time and money but also leads to more successful product outcomes.
If you're looking for a team that can help you build a precise and effective MVP, we are here to support you. We focus on smart and lean development, ensuring your resources are spent wisely and your product evolves based on real-world feedback.
If you have any questions or a project in mind, we’re always happy to talk and explore how we can help you succeed. Schedule your call with Austin here.
.jpg)
